Social influence is an integral part of our lives and affects the way we think, feel, and act in various situations. From the obvious to the less apparent, it shapes our opinions, attitudes, and decisions.
This article explores the theories, types, and dynamics of opinion formation that drive social influence. It discusses conformity, obedience, and minority influence theory, as well as the three types of social influence: informational social influence, normative social influence, and identification. We discuss examples of each type of social influence and how they manifest in our daily lives. Understanding the complexities of social influence, from agency theory to how the presence of a dissident can decrease conformity levels, helps us appreciate the long-lasting effects it has on our behavior and future decisions.
What is Social Influence?
Social influence is an important concept to understand, as it can help individuals make more informed decisions. It is the process by which an individual’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are affected by other people. This influence can be exerted through conformity, persuasion, peer pressure, normative influence, informational influence, or imitation.
Conformity occurs when a person changes their behavior in order to fit in with a group of people. Persuasion involves convincing someone to change their opinion or behavior based on logical arguments and evidence. Peer pressure is the feeling that one must conform to what others are doing in order to be accepted by them.
Normative influence is when an individual follows social norms out of fear of being judged negatively if they do not comply with them. Informational influence happens when an individual looks for guidance from those around them who have more knowledge than themselves about a certain topic or situation. Lastly, imitation occurs when someone copies another person’s behavior because they believe it will lead to positive outcomes for themselves as well as acceptance from others around them.
Understanding social influence can help individuals make better decisions and avoid negative consequences associated with following the wrong crowd or making poor choices due to peer pressure or conformity issues. By recognizing how these different types of influences work and how they affect our decision-making processes, we can become better equipped to avoid potential pitfalls while still maintaining our own sense of identity and autonomy within society.
Make sure to check out our article about scarcity in marketing.
Social Influence Theories
2.1. Conformity Theory
The concept of social influence is perhaps best understood through conformity theory, which deals with how people adjust their behaviors or attitudes in response to perceived group pressures. Conformity refers to the tendency of individuals to align themselves with the opinions and norms of a group rather than maintain an independent mindset.
According to James Mill, the English philosopher and economist who proposed the idea in the 1790s, conformity is based upon the desire to appear attractive, popular, accepted, and successful within society. This idea has recently been revived by Robert Cialdini in his book Influence, which discusses the importance of using social influence for persuasion.
Conformity can be divided further into two categories: informational conformity and normative conformity. Informational conformity occurs when one lacks complete information and relies on other members of the group to provide it. It is based upon the assumption that others have accurate knowledge, and it is important not just to accept this knowledge but also to internalize it and come to believe it oneself.
Normative conformity occurs when one conforms to fit in with a group as part of a need for acceptance, approval, or belonging. Individuals may express support for views accepted by the group even if they don’t personally accept them.
2.2. Obedience Theory
Obedience is a type of social influence where the pressure comes from an authority figure. Authority figures have the power to punish disobedience, making this form of influence very powerful. Studies into obedience began shortly after World War II when researchers such as Theodor Adorno and Stanley Milgram sought to identify why people would obey such horrific orders by higher authorities. Milgram demonstrated that circumstantial variables determine the likelihood of someone obeying: all participants in his famous experiment obeyed, though to varying degrees.
The key element in Milgram’s agency theory is that an individual will obey a legitimate authority. This authority must be seen as knowledgeable, rational, fair, and able to take responsibility for the consequences of their commands. In a variation of Milgram’s study, almost all participants refused to obey if reminded of their own responsibility. Furthermore, in a version involving a confederate, participants were far more likely to obey orders when less personally responsible for the consequences.
2.3. Minority Influence Theory
Minority influence involves a small group of individuals trying to persuade the majority to subscribe to their beliefs and values, despite external pressure to conform. This is done with the aim of transforming existing beliefs and behaviors.
According to Serge Moscovi, consistency is the most important factor in minority influence: those showing a strong and consistent commitment to a cause and refusing to change are most successful in influencing the majority. A snowball effect can then occur whereby the majority gradually adopts the minority opinion; this is known as social cryptomnesia, where people forget how the change came about.
Recent research has demonstrated that while consistent commitment may initiate conversations, identification with a minority group is just as important as agreeing with their views in order to change the behavior of the majority. Some researchers argue that actual flexibility and compromise over genuine belief are necessary for a conscious exchange of ideas between the majority and minority.
Nemeth’s study tested this idea and found that when the consistent minority compromised, the majority followed and changed their view. Thus, it appears that a committed minority can bring about meaningful change, provided they are prepared to demonstrate self-confidence and dedication and refuse to budge from their position.
Types of Social Influence
3.1. Informational Social Influence
Informational social influence is when people rely on others to provide accurate information in a situation where they are unsure of or lack knowledge. It occurs when an individual is uncertain in a situation, often due to a lack of understanding or expertise, and chooses to rely upon external sources for accuracy.
This is often seen in endeavors such as problem-solving and critical decision-making, where one might need support from more experienced or knowledgeable peers to make the best possible choice.
Muzafer Sherif demonstrated this in an experiment using the autokinetic effect whereby individuals who gave answers in a group provided varying distances that eventually converged, suggesting that the individual had used others’ answers to inform their own and ultimately resulting in conformity.
This type of influence leads to conformity and is associated with internalization; an example would be using the correct fork when eating at a posh restaurant. Jenness (1932) conducted a study on informational influence, which suggested that people tend to have temporary changes in behavior rather than internal opinion when faced with informational influence.
3.2. Normative Social Influence
Normative social influence is based on conforming to fit in better with a group and to be accepted by it. It is not enforced with instructions but instead comprises the sum of all spoken and unspoken norms of a group.
The goal of this type of influence is to maintain standing within the group and be liked and respected by them. The underlying psychological factor behind this is that people value the opinions of other members of their social group and therefore want to conform to the social norms of the group in order to gain acceptance or belongingness.
Asch’s experiments in social psychology clearly illustrated this form of influence, and Zimbardo’s prison study further extends to external behavior rather than just internal opinions. One of the main issues when it comes to normative influence is the formation of pressures to perform certain actions or else face negative repercussions from the group. Some researchers remark that the most influential form of social pressure involves peer pressure and tangible rewards for conformity.
Identification is a medium level of social influence whereby an individual changes their behavior in accordance with both private and public scenarios in order to gain acceptance from the group. Identification typically relates to personality development, emotional adjustment, and even career choices, as individuals may seek to gain the favor of other members of the society around them to find success.
Studies conducted by Kelman (1958) distinguished three types of conformity, including identification, which could lead to a second-order change in attitude such that an individual adjusts some of their behaviors to fit into a particular role without actually internalizing their beliefs. An example of this type of conformity would be cutting one’s hair in the most popular style, buying a celebrity-endorsed shade of lipstick, or even voting for a politician because they are portrayed as being plain-spoken and down-to-earth. Acting loud and raucous every time one is out with friends could also constitute an example of identification.
Dynamics of Opinion Formation
4.1. Public vs. Private Conformity
The concept of social influence refers to the way that people’s thoughts, beliefs, and behaviors can be influenced by the presence of other people. There are two primary forms of social influence: observer effect—the influence that others have on an individual as they observe their own behavior—and social conformity—the influence exerted by others when they contribute to a majority judgment.
People naturally tend to conform to the prevailing opinion within a group; this type of pressure is often referred to as “group conformity.” Moreover, the greater the size of the majority group, or the more extremes its opinions, the stronger the social pressure upon individuals. This is known as the Attraction Effect, where people become more likely to adopt attitudes that echo those of the majority group.
Social pressures can also lead to private conformity, where a person conforms internally but publicly maintains a different perspective or performs in an individualistic manner. Walter Lippmann, who coined the phrase “Where all think alike, no one thinks very much,” aimed to demonstrate how strategic private conformity creates personal freedom, resulting in an escape from the collective bondage of thought.
Generally speaking, the more similar participants feel with regard to certain characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, and power, the more likely they are to agree (match) with each other. Where the differences between comparison lines are seen to be slight, the task requires greater cognitive thought, making it more difficult for participants to gain a sense of correctness, thus increasing their likelihood to conform.
The second level of social influence is internalization, which involves efforts to change another person’s beliefs, attitudes, or behavior by convincing them to accept certain ideas as their own. It is believed to occur when an authority figure presents some kind of new idea or suggestion, and the individual citizens intuitively accept it, internalizing the statements or culture of the group.
Social learning theory suggests that an individual develops new beliefs and behaviors due to the rewards and punishments given by parents, teachers, and authority figures. During internalization, the person takes ownership of the belief, ideology, or behavior, adapting it as his/her own, adapting to the roles and expectations of the social group.
Jenness’s study of internalization in 1932 investigated a group of boys aged 14–15, trying to unwrap why they willingly changed their behavior when faced with undesirable tasks, such as cleaning up after meals.
Through parameter values extracted from their observations and studies, Jenness found that complete acceptance of group expectations occurred. Furthermore, even when the observers were no longer present, internalized behavior continued, indicating the deepest level of adherence to a new set of values had been achieved.
Although these studies may represent a particular societal dynamic, there are countless examples of internalization in everyday life; taking on the religion of parents, adhering to cultural customs, waiting at red traffic lights, etc.
Compliance is a more superficial level of social influence than internalization but describes the same phenomenon whereby people comply with instructions or requests from a legitimate authority, despite their tendency to disagree. In psychological terms, compliance refers to the act of performing requested actions in public, despite privately holding a different viewpoint.
This form of conformity usually occurs under considerable social pressure, often from powerful authority figures, and is considered a short-term effect since the actions cease once the individual is no longer monitored.
Compliance strategies are used to gain compliance from others, such as the ‘foot-in-the door’ technique, which involves requesting a small action before asking for something larger, and the ‘door-in-the-face’ technique, whereby the requestor first asks for something enormous, followed by a smaller request within a reasonable timeframe.
Studies into obedience conducted by Milgram and Zimbardo suggest high levels of obedience can be seen when commands originate from authoritative sources, even if the situation appears unreasonable.
Taken together, we find that social influence is a complex process involving major psychological factors, situational variables, and social dynamics. In turn, it explains why people conform to others and why they are willing to obey commands without question. It is necessary to understand the dynamics of social influence in the society of today and take preventive measures, for example, in marketing communications, in order to reduce its problematic implications.
Through this exploration of social influence, a clearer picture emerges of the multifaceted and complex dynamics at play. It is clear that social influence is integral to our lives, from the simplest interactions to global impacts.
From conformity theory to obedience theory and majority and minority influence theory, we can understand how and why individuals may adjust their own thoughts, feelings, or behaviors in response to the actions of others.
The different types of social influence discussed have pertinent implications for opinion formation as well. Through public vs. private conformity, identification, and internalization, we gain insight into the forces that affect an individual’s interpretation of a reality they did not create but can observe and be influenced by.
Awareness of these concepts helps us to understand why compliance and influence may occur; it grants a better understanding of how those with power and authority can mobilize law-abiding masses to their ideological convictions.
Social influence often appears to be a force of manipulation, yet if understood properly and ethically used, its far-reaching effects can culminate in positive change. The ability to understand, identify and counteract its occurrence has direct societal and political implications. Indeed, to fully comprehend social influence is to potentially become empowered against it.
In summary, the broad scope of social influence reveals the intricate and extensive web of influences at work in our lives. From everyday matters to major social and political issues, the examination of social influence is essential.
We must strive to understand its nuances so that we may continue to progress on the path toward social equity. Accountability and education remain key tools in confronting and mastering these forces. This article seeks to provide a concise overview of social influence and its impact on society, illuminating the diverse methods that permit a person to alter their perspectives and mold contemporary realities.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the meaning of social influence?
Social influence refers to the ways in which individuals allow their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors to be modified by others through conformational pressure, persuasion, or even by simply observing the actions of others. It is a fundamental aspect of social interaction.
What is a social influence example?
Social influence is experienced in many different ways and can be seen in our everyday lives. An example of this would be conforming to the dress standard of a workplace or agreeing with the opinion of a friend simply because it is the majority opinion. Social influence is ever-present and affects us all.
What are the three types of social influence?
Social influence can come in many forms, with the three primary ones being utilitarian, value-expressive, and informational. Utilitarian influences focus on practical considerations such as cost or convenience, while informational influences provide people with facts and social proof. Finally, value-expressive influences shape values, beliefs, and outlooks on life. All three of these strategies are essential for understanding and influencing consumer behavior.
Why is social influence important?
Social influence is an important part of our lives because it facilitates social cohesion and allows us to build supportive relationships. It helps us align with positive norms and encourages cooperation, creativity, and progress. Our decisions are informed by those around us and by following the most common advice, we can make decisions that help us achieve our goals while doing what’s best for our communities.